End-of-life
vessel is hazardous waste, argued Sanjay Parikh:Procedure
for Prior Informed Consent and Prior Decontamination of ship in country of
export, not complied with :
New Delhi, July 23, 2012: The
Supreme Court bench of Justice Altamas Kabir and Justice J. Chelameswar heard
the arguments concerning the ex US ship Exxon Valdez which was allowed to be
anchored by the Gujarat Pollution Control and Gujarat Maritime Board in
violation of the order dated 3.5.2012 and the final order dated 6.7.2012 passed
by the same bench wherein they directed that Basel Convention is required to be
followed, in case of its breach action should be taken under the Municipal
Laws. Mr. Sanjay Parikh appearing for the applicant Mr. Gopal Krishna made the
following submissions:
1. The Basel Convention applies to the end
of life ships destined for ship breaking. These ships are floating hazardous
wastes.
2.The prior inform consent which applies in
case of Transboundary movement also applies to ship breaking because it is
Transboundary movement of the hazardous wastes embedded in the form of ship.
According to prior inform consent, the country of export should give all the
documents regarding the ship to the country of import and the ship should sail
from the country of export only after it has been granted permission by the
country of import.
3. The country of import has to look into
all the documents sent by the country of export including the nature and
quantity of hazardous wastes before granting any permission. In particular the
country of import should satisfy that the hazardous wastes can be disposed of
in environmentally sound manner.
4. The inventory of hazardous wastes with
the permission granted by the country of export should be verified by the
concerned authorities before granting permission of anchorage. The certified
inventory must tally the document Indian Authorities (MoEF) has with it. The
Basel Convention principle has been incorporated in Hazardous Wastes Rules
regarding prior inform consent.
5. Not only Exxon Valdez as well as other
ship enter in the Indian territorial water without prior inform consent. This
violates the basic principle involved in Transboundary movement of hazardous
wastes and compromises with environmental and safety safeguard. The absence of
State obligation and duty in granting prior inform consent, will result in
dumping of hazardous waste in India, a non OECD Country.
6. The CPCB, GMB, HPC, MoEF had all agreed
that prior decontamination of the ship by the country of export is required.
The 2003 order records prior decontamination of ship. This is based on the
Basel convention principle of minimization of hazardous wastes by the country
of export.
7. As far as Exxon Valdez is concerned,
neither prior inform consent nor prior decontamination by the country of export
was followed. Even cross checking of inventory of hazardous waste was not done.
The affidavits filed by MoEF, Ministry of shipping and GMB showed that they
only looked at the hazardous wastes lying in loose form on board. Today it is
not known how much Asbestos Waste, PCB, PCT, Waste Oil, Heavy Metals etc. the
said ship contains. The permission of anchoring is therefore, absolutely
illegal and in violation of the directions passed by this Hon⢬e Court.
8. A country like Bangladesh disallowed the entry
of Blue Lady. The Bangladesh Supreme Court in its judgment given in 2009,
directed that without prior de-contamination no ship be allowed for breaking in
Bangladesh territorial waters. The Bangladesh Supreme Court had followed 2003
order of the Supreme Court and disagrees with the procedure laid down in the
2007 order. They clearly observed that the Supreme Court of India has
compromised with environmental principle while passing 2007 order.
9. That in any case 2007 order of which
clarification was sought by applicant Gopal Krishna resulted in order dated
6.7.2012 where the Supreme Court re-established that the Basel Convention is
required to be followed in ship breaking.
During
the course of argument it clearly came out that the ship Exxon Valdez neither
followed prior inform consent procedure nor prior decontamination was done.
Surprisingly all the authorities including MoEF, GMB, Ministry of Shipping,
GPCB supported the ship breaker except Customs and CPCB which took the position
that the courts orders have been violated. The Supreme Court bench reserved the
case for judgment on next Monday i.e. 30th July, 2012. There was
reference made to the involvement of Dawood Ibrahim gang in the ship breaking
industry. Meanwhile, ToxicsWatch Alliance (TWA) has written to A C Buck, Director General of
Central Excise Intelligence (DGCEI) drawing its attention towards involvement of
terror elements in Alang ship-breaking business' and need for intelligence
sharing on Alang operations needed, say officials. The letter is attached.
For Details: Gopal Krishna, ToxicsWatch
Alliance (TWA), 9818089660,
No comments:
Post a Comment