Are Simultaneous Elections Desirable? A Debate on Possibilities & Challenges
New Delhi: A discussion was organised on 26th October at the India International Centre on the possibility of having simultaneous elections in India and the challenges which need to be overcome to make it a reality. Eminent speakers, including Shri Bhupender Yadav (Member of Parliament, Rajya Sabha), Dr S. Y. Quraishi, former CEC, Prof Sanjay Kumar, Director of Centre for Study of Developing Societies (CSDS) and Dr M R Madhavan, President of PRS Legislative Research presented their views and answered multiple questions posed by the audience which constituted members from various research organisations, students and the media. The event was organised by Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) and chaired by the organisation’s Founder – Trustee, Prof Jagdeep Chhokar.
The proceedings began with brief opening remarks by Prof Chhokar, emphasising the significance of elections. He said, “…elections are the most fundamental way of operationalising democracy”. Further he added that the discussion was an attempt to make an informed choice regarding the simultaneous elections and hoped to get concrete suggestions from the panel for action to improve the current scenario.
While speaking on the “Possibilities of holding simultaneous elections in India”, Shri Bhupender Yadav put across his argument using Mahatma Gandhi’s philosophy of means and ends. He emphasised that “…Elections are the means towards the end of serving the people. However, nowadays elections have become an end in itself”. He claimed that constant elections throughout the year all the over country act as a hindrance in the working of the government. He suggested that simultaneous elections will solve this problem and that, “There should be a pre-defined schedule for the elections and uniformity”.
Dr Quraishi, began by clarifying, “…this issue is not politically motivated”. Although he appreciated the idea of simultaneous election, he also mentioned that there is no clarity on how it will be implemented. He said, “…elections have become the root cause of corruption in the country.” He mentioned that political donations require quid-pro-quo, hence after winning elections, the politician-bureaucrat nexus indulges in “recovering the investment” and that is where corruption begins. He also emphasised on the fact “caste, religion and communal issues are perpetuated by constant elections.”
Speaking on election expenditure, he pointed out that, “There is a limit on candidate’s expenditure but not on party’s expenditure. Thus, there should be a limit on the political parties’ expenditure. Secondly, there should be state funding instead of private funding for the political parties. Thirdly, the elections should be held within a shorter span of time. He said that the proposal needs to be “thought through” in detail as there are many logistics issues involved like additional requirement of EVMs and security forces.
Prof Sanjay Kumar, speaking on “the challenges in holding simultaneous elections in India” felt that the democracy had an intrinsic value, and added, “…efforts should be made to hold simultaneous elections in those state assemblies which are completing their tenure together rather than forcing simultaneous elections by law.” He stated that a, study by CSDS of 31 Assembly elections that were held along with Lok Sabha elections from 1989 to 2014 show that in 24 instances/elections the major political parties polled almost a similar proportion of votes both for the Assembly and the Lok Sabha, while only in seven instances was the choice of voters somewhat different. If elections are held separately then regional parties have a better scope of winning. He concluded by saying, “Simultaneous elections will curb the voice of people living at the margins of the society by strangulating the scope for regional parties which reflect local aspirations/issues. This will reverse the process of deepening democracy.”
While talking about the various legal roadblocks faced in ushering in simultaneous elections, Dr Madhavan agreed with Prof Sanjay Kumar’s views on “……wave election problem” and explained that when the public is deeply swayed towards a party, there might be more chances of the party winning not only during the general elections but also any assembly elections held around the same time which could drastically affect the role of the regional parties representing the marginalized communities of the country. Quoting Shri Praveen Chakravarty’s paper which analysed the possible effect of simultaneous elections on voter behaviour, he added, “The paper analysed the 2600 Assembly Constituencies in 16 elections and during simultaneous election, 77% of the time the same party was chosen in the assembly constituency as well as the parliament and in non -simultaneous elections, difference was 61%”. He concluded by asking whether it was desirable if the focus was shifted away from local issues and moved towards only the national issues.
The speakers took various questions from the audience, revolving around the fate of regional parties; scope for the formation of new parties and increased expenditure over EVMs in simultaneous elections. Dr Quraishi addressed these questions and provided several counter-arguments to the fellow panelists’ arguments. He disagreed with politicians’ stand that elections were a hindrance to the implementation of government schemes.
Prof. Sanjay addressed the issue regarding the proliferation of regional parties. He re-asserted that “…simultaneous elections might lead to the decline in the political status of regional parties. It will cause reverse democratisation.” Further, he called out for “… the need of revision in the model code of conduct.”
Concluding the session, Prof. Chhokar stated that, “…‘one nation- one election’ is a surreptitious attempt to destroy the federal character of India.” He argued that it was against the federal character of Constitution. Secondly, while disagreeing with Mr. Yadav, he stated, “that means and ends are interlinked.” He expressed his disagreement with Prof. Sanjay over the revision in the model code of conduct. He stated that revision of the model code of conduct would destroy it. He stated that the proposal for simultaneous elections was politically motivated.
MYRIAD COLOURS OF NORTH EAST WILL COME ALIVE AT THE NORTH EAST FESTIVAL 2016
Curtain Raiser NE Festival 2016
· 4th edition, which promises to be bigger, to be held at IGNCA from 4th to 6thNovember 2016
· 3-day festival to promote the resplendent culture all the Northeastern states – including food, fashion, handicrafts, music, dance, tourism, creative performances and much more
· Discussion sessions with all the stakeholders on key issues affecting the region to be also held during the event
· Debut of the ‘North East Rock Battle’ amongst the colleges and bands of Delhi
· A huge exhibition of products from North East called ‘Make in North East Exhibition’ by around 100 entrepreneurs from the region
New Delhi | October 26 2016: The fourth edition of the North East Festival – Connecting People, Celebrating Life – is set to enthrall the people of the capital and is set to be organized from 4th to 6th November 2016 at the Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts, New Delhi. The North East Festival aims to showcase to the people of Delhi the rich cultural heritage of the North Eastern part of the country and integrate the Northeast with the rest of India. Over the last three years, lakhs of people have attended the North East Festival, which has gone on to become one of the biggest festivals of Delhi.
Just before the festival begins, a rock competition titled ‘North East Festival Rock Battle’ is being organized on 28th and 29th October, 2016 at Dilli Haat amongst the colleges and bands of Delhi, wherein 60 bands will perform. The winning band stands a chance of winning a trip to Dubai, with the second and third placed getting a trip to a domestic destination courtesy Spicejet.
The 3-day festivities will have fun and frolic galore will showcase the entire Northeast India in all its finest glory and colourful hues via art, crafts and culture, songs, dance and movies, food, sports and fashion and much more.
Headlining the North East Festival 2016 would be the musical festival comprising icons of North East Region such as Papon, Zubeen Garg, rapper Borkung Hrangkhal, DJ Zaeden, rock bands Traffic Jam, Fourth Element, Mo & The Shooting Stars, Reverse Tragedy and many more. Raax Leela of Manipur, around 20 folk dance forms, along with the famous Ram Vijay Ankia Bhaona of Assam will be presented by Sangeet Natak Akademi. Fashion shows comprising of the best North East handlooms would be showcased by around 20 talented young designers and models of the North East region. For food lovers, an exotic collection of delectable cuisines from the North East with around 30 food stalls will be on offer.
North East is also famous for its traditional sports. North East Festival would display the traditional sports of North East with around 14 sports which would be part of the festival. Live art, a photography exhibition showcasing the vivid wildlife and natural beauty of the region, an art workshop with 20 talented young artistes of North East, plenty of interactive games – the gala North East Festival will have it all!
A large exhibition of products from North East called “Make in North East Exhibition”, including handloom & handicraft, agro and food products would be on display with around 100 entrepreneurs participating from all across the North East region, who would present their products.
North East Festival is an effective platform for raising the critical issues affecting the North East. Mr. Shyamkanu Mahanta, Chief Organiser, North East Festival said, “This year we will be holding a seminar dedicated to flood and erosion that affects the region, which would see experts from IITs across the country who would congregate and discuss about the Brahmaputra to find a permanent solution to flood and erosion issues along with stakeholders of NER. The seminar would be presented by Water Resources Department, Govt. of Assam and would see participation from various multilaterals and the Central Government. Assam Tourism would be presenting a seminar on ‘Awesome Assam’ with tour operators across the country. There would be discussion on sports, B2B Meets on tourism and many more.”
Mr. Mahanta also informed that one of the core objectives for this edition will be to promote tourism in the region and plenty of tour operators and tourists are slated to attend the North East Festival. He added that it would also be a platform to promote business for North East entrepreneurs, apart from building bridges with Delhi.
Debate ADR: Simultaneous Elections is Scammed Democracy
October27, 2016 (C) Ravinder Singh progressindia2015@gmail.com
Concerned citizens of India discussed the GAIN & LOSS of holding
Simultaneous Elections to Lok Sabha, State Assemblies, Zilaparishads
and Panchayats.
Simultaneous Elections to Lok Sabha, State Assemblies, Zilaparishads
and Panchayats.
There was no doubt regarding Decimation of Smaller & Regional
Political Parties when Elections are Held Simultaneously and top 2-3
parties to cornering all the seats.
Political Parties when Elections are Held Simultaneously and top 2-3
parties to cornering all the seats.
Former Chief Election Commissioner explained that 10 times more Voting
Machines will be required in case of simultaneous elections. Even Lok
Sabha elections are held in 9 Phases due to ‘Limited Voting Machines
and Human Resources & Security Arrangements required.’
Machines will be required in case of simultaneous elections. Even Lok
Sabha elections are held in 9 Phases due to ‘Limited Voting Machines
and Human Resources & Security Arrangements required.’
1. Democracy is about Governance through Discussions & Debates and
Equitably Sharing National Prosperity – But Holding Simultaneous
Election will allow anyone with Corporate Backing to give Day & Night
‘Bhashan’ Broadcast By All Media – and Rule over 1300m Indians
$2000b-$5000b Economy for 5 Years – For Better Governance ‘PARLIAMENT
& ASSEMBLIES to Work Minimum 150 Days Annually and also For Better
Accountability.’
Equitably Sharing National Prosperity – But Holding Simultaneous
Election will allow anyone with Corporate Backing to give Day & Night
‘Bhashan’ Broadcast By All Media – and Rule over 1300m Indians
$2000b-$5000b Economy for 5 Years – For Better Governance ‘PARLIAMENT
& ASSEMBLIES to Work Minimum 150 Days Annually and also For Better
Accountability.’
2. It is a Lame Duck excuse that Development suffers due to elections
in some part of India or the other – Ex CEC clarified on this that
many times Parties make promises in Election Manifestos but forget to
implement them for 4 Years and 11 months and make announcements just
before next election. There is no restriction otherwise on ONGOING
Development Processes. Even in matters of Deficient & Scanty Rainfall
CENTER & STATES delay notifying ‘Drought Affected Districts’ denying
timely AID TO FARMERS IN DISTRESS.
in some part of India or the other – Ex CEC clarified on this that
many times Parties make promises in Election Manifestos but forget to
implement them for 4 Years and 11 months and make announcements just
before next election. There is no restriction otherwise on ONGOING
Development Processes. Even in matters of Deficient & Scanty Rainfall
CENTER & STATES delay notifying ‘Drought Affected Districts’ denying
timely AID TO FARMERS IN DISTRESS.
3. It was also Highlighted that even with a Wafer Thin Majority – The
Indian Government SHORT CIRCUITS all Administrative Procedures in
Award & Funding Of Projects. Big Projects are Awarded without
Competition and Even Without Detailed Project Reports.
Indian Government SHORT CIRCUITS all Administrative Procedures in
Award & Funding Of Projects. Big Projects are Awarded without
Competition and Even Without Detailed Project Reports.
4. Ex CEC estimated Rs.30,000 Cr* was spent during 2014 Lok Sabha
elections when expenses Limit for a Lok Sabha candidate is Rs.7
million but no limit for political parties who may each spend Rs.70
crores per constituency. This Rs.30,000 Cr is Gross Underestimation
when Each 1 hour Show of a ‘Star Campaigner’ broadcast live in all
Channels may cost Rs.100 Cr to Rs.200 Cr. A STAR CAMPAIGNER MAY HOLD
3-4 RALLIES AT DIFFERENT LOCATIONS IN A DAY AND ALL CHANNELS DUTY
FULLY REPEAT SAME CONTENT EACH TIME – Over 100-300 Times – BLACKOUT
COVERAGE OF OTHER PARTIES.
elections when expenses Limit for a Lok Sabha candidate is Rs.7
million but no limit for political parties who may each spend Rs.70
crores per constituency. This Rs.30,000 Cr is Gross Underestimation
when Each 1 hour Show of a ‘Star Campaigner’ broadcast live in all
Channels may cost Rs.100 Cr to Rs.200 Cr. A STAR CAMPAIGNER MAY HOLD
3-4 RALLIES AT DIFFERENT LOCATIONS IN A DAY AND ALL CHANNELS DUTY
FULLY REPEAT SAME CONTENT EACH TIME – Over 100-300 Times – BLACKOUT
COVERAGE OF OTHER PARTIES.
5. There were Deep Concerns about Cultural, Regional & Local issues
SIDETRACKED or TOTALLY NEGLECTED IN ‘ULTRA MEGA POLITICAL ELECTIONS’ –
India has Thousands of Languages & Dialects, Cultures, Religions,
Tribes and Specific Local Issues.
SIDETRACKED or TOTALLY NEGLECTED IN ‘ULTRA MEGA POLITICAL ELECTIONS’ –
India has Thousands of Languages & Dialects, Cultures, Religions,
Tribes and Specific Local Issues.
No Election Code & Ethics
6. Even though Supreme Court of India had fully ‘Empowered Election
Commission to Ensure Fair & Free Elections’ but Election Commission
has not yet come out with ‘Election Code & Ethics’ And Doesn’t Conduct
or Observe ‘Inner Party Elections.’
Commission to Ensure Fair & Free Elections’ but Election Commission
has not yet come out with ‘Election Code & Ethics’ And Doesn’t Conduct
or Observe ‘Inner Party Elections.’
7. In USA Term of Office is 4 Years but nomination process Lasts 1.5
Years– Presidential Candidates are Finally Selected 5-6 months before
Scheduled Elections. In India some Dubious People want All The
Elections to be over in 30-40 Days – Then No Accountability.
8. All 1000 Plus Political Parties ‘Recognized and Registered,
National & State’ Have ALMOST IDENTICAL ‘OBJECTIVES’ and SIMILAR
CONSTITUTION.
Years– Presidential Candidates are Finally Selected 5-6 months before
Scheduled Elections. In India some Dubious People want All The
Elections to be over in 30-40 Days – Then No Accountability.
8. All 1000 Plus Political Parties ‘Recognized and Registered,
National & State’ Have ALMOST IDENTICAL ‘OBJECTIVES’ and SIMILAR
CONSTITUTION.
9. ELECTION COMMISSION HAS FAILED TO ENSURE ‘AS REGISTRAR OF
POLITICAL PARTIES TO ENSURE INNER PARTY DEMOCRACY’ – FREE & FAIR INNER
PARTY ELECTIONS – ON ANNUAL BASIS. NOMINATION OF CANDIDATES SHOULD BE
THROUGH DUE INNER PARTY ELECTIONS THROUGH SECRET BALLET.
POLITICAL PARTIES TO ENSURE INNER PARTY DEMOCRACY’ – FREE & FAIR INNER
PARTY ELECTIONS – ON ANNUAL BASIS. NOMINATION OF CANDIDATES SHOULD BE
THROUGH DUE INNER PARTY ELECTIONS THROUGH SECRET BALLET.
[There was Dispute Over Control of a Registered Temple Society – One
Party Went to Court – An Observer Was Appointed – Election Process Was
Followed & New Management Elected. Election was through SECRET BALLOT
even for about 100 members. How is that parties with even over 100
million members has no Inner Party Elections through secret Ballot]
Party Went to Court – An Observer Was Appointed – Election Process Was
Followed & New Management Elected. Election was through SECRET BALLOT
even for about 100 members. How is that parties with even over 100
million members has no Inner Party Elections through secret Ballot]
10. Election Commission Should Introduce Registration Process For ALL
Candidates Before NOMINATION – 6 months in advance for LOK SABHA, 2
months for Vidhan Sabha & 30 Days for Zilaparishad, Municipalities and
Panchyat.
Candidates Before NOMINATION – 6 months in advance for LOK SABHA, 2
months for Vidhan Sabha & 30 Days for Zilaparishad, Municipalities and
Panchyat.
[It is FRAUD on People of India when in the age of Broadband Global
Connectivity – people don’t even know the Candidates they vote, their
Qualifications, their Political Views & Integrity or Criminality.]
Connectivity – people don’t even know the Candidates they vote, their
Qualifications, their Political Views & Integrity or Criminality.]
11. Election Commission should Direct Political Parties to ‘DEFINE IN
FAIR DETAIL [4-5 Pages] THEIR ECONOMIC POLICIES & SOCIAL CULTURAL
AGENDA’ Under ‘Objective Of Political Party’ in Constitution of Every
Party – Manifestos are FRAUDS on People because these are not
registered documents – no party cares about Manifestos after
elections.
FAIR DETAIL [4-5 Pages] THEIR ECONOMIC POLICIES & SOCIAL CULTURAL
AGENDA’ Under ‘Objective Of Political Party’ in Constitution of Every
Party – Manifestos are FRAUDS on People because these are not
registered documents – no party cares about Manifestos after
elections.
[Manifestos talk of Poor & Farmers but Give Rs.2,50,000 Cr for RJio
alone without bids or DPR]
alone without bids or DPR]
Promote Debates & Restrict Political Bhashans
12. Election Commission should REGULATE ‘Political Bhashans By
Ministers’ at Public Events and EC may Allocate Special New ‘DD
Political Channels’ funded by parties – One Each for Registered
National Parties to Have Polled 15% or more Votes and One Channel to
Time Share Among other National Parties – 10 Political Channels For
Registered State Parties – Ruling State Parties May Get 6 Hours Daily
Time Allotted and rest of State Parties to have Polled 1 million votes
to Time Share 6 Hours. Smaller Unregistered Parties to Get 1 hour per
Week On Lottery Basis.
Ministers’ at Public Events and EC may Allocate Special New ‘DD
Political Channels’ funded by parties – One Each for Registered
National Parties to Have Polled 15% or more Votes and One Channel to
Time Share Among other National Parties – 10 Political Channels For
Registered State Parties – Ruling State Parties May Get 6 Hours Daily
Time Allotted and rest of State Parties to have Polled 1 million votes
to Time Share 6 Hours. Smaller Unregistered Parties to Get 1 hour per
Week On Lottery Basis.
13. EC to Permit On NEWS CHANNELS ‘Debates Among Top Political Leaders
& Ministers or Top Professionals Only’ and Compulsory PRESS CONFERENCE
BY CONCERNED MINISTERS of One Hour Whenever a New Project of
Importance & New Policy is Introduced.
& Ministers or Top Professionals Only’ and Compulsory PRESS CONFERENCE
BY CONCERNED MINISTERS of One Hour Whenever a New Project of
Importance & New Policy is Introduced.
[This is to eliminate PROFESSIONAL ABUSERS of parties to defame Ruling
& Opposition Leaders]
& Opposition Leaders]
14. EC to Formulate ETHICS CODE FOR POLITICIANS – A Person Who Has
SERVED AS MINISTER FOR ONE TERM Shall Contest for Elections Again for
Lower Position, A Person May Contest One Election in 5 Years, and 5
Elections in Lifetime – No Losers to Be Appointed Minister or Governor
Within 5 Years.
SERVED AS MINISTER FOR ONE TERM Shall Contest for Elections Again for
Lower Position, A Person May Contest One Election in 5 Years, and 5
Elections in Lifetime – No Losers to Be Appointed Minister or Governor
Within 5 Years.
[This is to Prevent Losers in Elections Appointed as Ministers or
Governors or other Office of Profit]
Governors or other Office of Profit]
Ravinder Singh, Inventor & Consultant, INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES AND PROJECTS
Y-77, Hauz Khas, New Delhi-110016, India. Ph; 091- 9871056471,
9718280435, 9650421857
Ravinder Singh* is a WIPO awarded inventor specializing in Power,
Transportation,
Smart Cities, Water, Energy Saving, Agriculture, Manufacturing,
Technologies and Projects
Y-77, Hauz Khas, New Delhi-110016, India. Ph; 091- 9871056471,
9718280435, 9650421857
Ravinder Singh* is a WIPO awarded inventor specializing in Power,
Transportation,
Smart Cities, Water, Energy Saving, Agriculture, Manufacturing,
Technologies and Projects
GINT 2016 – Geisteswissenschaften International Nonfiction Translators Competition
GINT 2016 – Geisteswissenschaften International Nonfiction Translators Competition
deutsch/ englisch
Geisteswissenschaften International in cooperation with the German Book Office is inviting all aspiring translators of German to participate in a competition. The winning translations will receive prize money of EUR 500. The organizers wish to assist interested English-language publishers in their search for authors and topics from Germany. The titles in the competition have been awarded the “Geisteswissenschaften International” translation grant but have not yet found a licensee. In Germany, these books are gems in the field of Humanities and Social Sciences.
In order to take part in the competition, participants have to formally confirm that to date, they have not published more than one book-length translation of their own. By submitting a translation for the competition, translators agree to our regulations, and confirm that the text they are turning in is their work alone. This means that they completed the translation without the assistance of another person or team.
Two German excerpts to translate (approx. 900 words)each can be downloaded from www.boersenverein.de/gint. Please choose one excerpt and submit your English translation to Ms. Anke Simon (geisteswissenschaften-international@ boev.de) by November 14, 2016. However, only the first 50 entries to reach the Geisteswissenschaften International office by sequence of arrival will be accepted. Translations need to be delivered in Indian (or British) English.
Please note the following: Translated excerpts must be returned together with a statement that you understand the rules and that you certify that you are eligible to submit a translation under these rules. In the event of evidence that a submission was improperly made, we reserve the right to rescind the award. (You can just respond with “I understand the rules and confirm that I am eligible.“ unless you have questions.) The winners will be notified via email by December 31, 2016 and officially announced in January 2017.
For more information, contact
Geisteswissenschaften International
c/o Börsenverein des Deutschen Buchhandels e.V.
Braubachstr. 16
60311 Frankfurt am Main
Germany
phone +49 (0) 69/ 1306 – 599
Cyrus Mistry’s mysterious ouster:
Cyrus Mistry’s mysterious ouster: Tatas may sync with global trends
October 25, 2016,
Rajiv Kumar
The terse, bland press statement from Bombay House about Cyrus Mistry’s departure left me bewildered. This was worse than any scene from corporate fiction in which the CEO is given the pink slip at the shortest possible notice.
This is most unusual and not in keeping with the reputation of good corporate governance that the Tatas had earned over the past decades.
It also may not be that easy for the appointed five-member search committee to find a replacement with solid credentials and a modicum of self-respect. That would, unfortunately, but expectedly, boil the search down to another insider from the community. Will that not be a pity?
There can be three possible explanations to this most unusual action.
This is most unusual and not in keeping with the reputation of good corporate governance that the Tatas had earned over the past decades.
It also may not be that easy for the appointed five-member search committee to find a replacement with solid credentials and a modicum of self-respect. That would, unfortunately, but expectedly, boil the search down to another insider from the community. Will that not be a pity?
There can be three possible explanations to this most unusual action.
First, that Mistry genuinely felt that he was not up to the job of shepherding a sprawling conglomerate whose expanse across sectors and geographies defies all attempt at finding an organisational or operational coherence.
This explanation is most unlikely because Mistry did not seem to be a quitter and his exertions over the last four years would also tend to deny this possibility.
This explanation is most unlikely because Mistry did not seem to be a quitter and his exertions over the last four years would also tend to deny this possibility.
Second, that he was found wanting on performance and was summarily removed from the position by Tata Sons, in which the Tata Trust – still headed by Ratan Tata – and Shapoorji Pallonji hold controlling shares.
Given that nearly all of Tata companies – including the laggard Tata Motors – have seen a rise in their market capitalisation over the past year, the performance according to this visible yardstick could certainly not be faulted.
Other performance criteria are trotted out on the electronic media by current and former Tata PR hacks. These includ, ‘poor communication style’ (sic); indecisive leader qua the back and forth with Tata’s steel operations in Britain and Europe; and inability to find the CEO of some Tata companies.Redrawing Top, Bottom LinesThese are all second-order and weak criteria if they are at all relevant, given that both the top and bottom lines of the group as a whole were doing fine. In business, these are the two principal criteria that should matter.
Apparently not for Bombay House. The argument that only a couple of Tata companies were keeping the entire group afloat is neither here nor there. It has always been the case.
Given that nearly all of Tata companies – including the laggard Tata Motors – have seen a rise in their market capitalisation over the past year, the performance according to this visible yardstick could certainly not be faulted.
Other performance criteria are trotted out on the electronic media by current and former Tata PR hacks. These includ, ‘poor communication style’ (sic); indecisive leader qua the back and forth with Tata’s steel operations in Britain and Europe; and inability to find the CEO of some Tata companies.Redrawing Top, Bottom LinesThese are all second-order and weak criteria if they are at all relevant, given that both the top and bottom lines of the group as a whole were doing fine. In business, these are the two principal criteria that should matter.
Apparently not for Bombay House. The argument that only a couple of Tata companies were keeping the entire group afloat is neither here nor there. It has always been the case.
So for me, the third explanation looks to be the most plausible. This is the traditional case of the Tata Group’s corporate satraps rising against the CEO. With a difference. In that on this occasion, unlike in the case of Russi Mody and Darbari Seth et al versus Ratan Tata, the satraps have won.
There was already news of some of them chafing at Mistr’s attempt to make the group leaner and more focused and bringing in external consultants for greater professionalism. The satraps, who are best left unnamed, have pushed back and apparently received the backing of Tata Trust, whose chairman, reportedly, did not have as hands-off an approach as is claimed.
Abesieged Mistry, closeted by satraps on one side and the Trust on the other, could well have given the classic CEO ultimatum of ‘my way or the highway’. In this case, he was unceremoniously told to get on the bike.
There was already news of some of them chafing at Mistr’s attempt to make the group leaner and more focused and bringing in external consultants for greater professionalism. The satraps, who are best left unnamed, have pushed back and apparently received the backing of Tata Trust, whose chairman, reportedly, did not have as hands-off an approach as is claimed.
Abesieged Mistry, closeted by satraps on one side and the Trust on the other, could well have given the classic CEO ultimatum of ‘my way or the highway’. In this case, he was unceremoniously told to get on the bike.
Ratan Uncle, can I open my present now?From all accounts, this seems to be a personality-driven outcome – and, hence, neither well-prepared nor well-executed. We could give it the spin of being a clash of opposite cultures. But it would be just that: a spin. After all, Mistry has been on the board of Tata Sons since 2006 and has the genetic inheritance for all the required culture to have been ingrained in him.
In some sense, he was the quintessential Tata man: quiet, understated, focused, a believer in professionalism, and committed to the larger corporate and national cause. In the absence of any explanation from any of the Bombay House reticent denizens, this would appear to be the best conjecture.
This can be a watershed event in the Tata group’s long history. Does a holding company like Tata Sons bring any value to its globally competing constituents?Ta-ta to Old Style
In some sense, he was the quintessential Tata man: quiet, understated, focused, a believer in professionalism, and committed to the larger corporate and national cause. In the absence of any explanation from any of the Bombay House reticent denizens, this would appear to be the best conjecture.
This can be a watershed event in the Tata group’s long history. Does a holding company like Tata Sons bring any value to its globally competing constituents?Ta-ta to Old Style
Even the Japanese Zaibatsus (the pre-World War 2 industrial and financial business conglomerates) or the South Korean chaebols (large family-owned business conglomerates) have changed their functioning to be in sync with globalisation trends and requirements. It is time that Tatas did so as well.
This may also yield some positive externalities as individual Tata companies focus more on product innovation and related R&D rather than try and use the advantage that Bombay House afforded them of being on the inside track of the regulatory regime and nimbly negotiating the Kafkaesque Delhi bureaucracy. This could change the operational model of India Inc.
The writer is senior fellow, Centre for Policy Research
This may also yield some positive externalities as individual Tata companies focus more on product innovation and related R&D rather than try and use the advantage that Bombay House afforded them of being on the inside track of the regulatory regime and nimbly negotiating the Kafkaesque Delhi bureaucracy. This could change the operational model of India Inc.
The writer is senior fellow, Centre for Policy Research
“Digital Inclusion: Moving One Step Closer”
Dear Mr. Sagar
Pahle India Foundation (PIF) is pleased to invite you to participate in the launch of our report “Digital Inclusion: Moving One Step Closer”. The report is the outcome of a month-long survey in four locations looking at internet usage patterns of low-income households. The objective of the survey was to study the internet usage and contribute to the debate on how to promote digital inclusion in India.
The report will be released on 2nd November 2016, Wednesday, at 3.00 p.m. at The Tamarind (Entry from Gate No. 1), India Habitat Centre, Lodhi Road, New Delhi. The report will be released by Mr. Anil Kaushal, Full Time Member, TRAI.
We are sure that your participation will enrich and provide for an engaging discussion. We look forward to seeing you. You may also nominate other officials of your organization to participate in the same. The full program is appended for your perusal.
A line in confirmation of your participation sent to Mr. Anil Kumar, Assistant Manager, PIF, at anil.kumar@pahleindia.org will be greatly appreciated. He may also be reached at +91 11 41551498 or at +91 8826408889.
Programme
2.30 pm onwards: Registration
Session 1:
3.00 pm to 3.40 pm: Opening remarks by Dr. Rajiv Kumar, Founder Director, Pahle India Foundation
Release of report “Digital Inclusion: Moving One Step Closer”
Special address by Mr. Anil Kaushal, Full Time Member, TRAI
Keynote address by Mr. R Chandrashekhar, President, NASSCOM
Question & Answer
3.40 pm to 3.45 pm: Break
Session 2:
3.45 pm to 4 pm: Presentation & recommendation by Mr. Saurabh Roy, Fellow, Pahle India Foundation
Session 3:
4.00 pm to 5.15 pm: Panel discussion: ‘Optimal Data Pricing for Digital Inclusion’
Discussants are:
Mr. Shivnath Thukral, MD, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Mr. Ravi Gandhi*, Head Policy, Airtel
Mr. Yashish Dahiya, CEO, Policybazaar
Ms. Nirupama Soundararajan, Senior Fellow, Pahle India Foundation
*invited
Many thanks!
Rajiv Kumar
Senior Fellow, CPR & Founder Director
Pahle India Foundation
C4/54 First Floor
Safdarjung Development Area
New Delhi – 110016
No comments:
Post a Comment